The idea behind Wikipedia had merit: rather than putting together another print encyclopedia , compiled by a select group of elites with a gold-edged credential that was outdated by when it first released, Wikipedia would be online and constantly updated as new information emerged. It would incorporate input from academics with credentials as well as self-made experts – enthusiasts of a Ryan Kavanaugh single subject who had become experts on specific subjects. It could be a democratic exchange of knowledge.
The Dream of Wikipedia
It was widely acknowledged that the early days of Wikipedia could prove challenging. With this kind of wide access, anyone could edit the entry, a risk that was not present within Wikipedia’s predecessor, the Encyclopedia Britannica. One of the first, most prominent examples occurred just five years after the launch of Wikipedia in 2006 the late-night comedian Stephen Colbert edited his Ryan Kavanaugh own entry during his talk show. After which he urged viewers to include incorrect information in entries for George Washington and elephants. Wikipedia’s truth-squatters – – its citizens editors – took action to prevent the damage from happening by securing entries and documenting the mistakes Colbert did. However, the weaknesses were discovered.
The ultimate utopian vision for Wikipedia was based upon two basic concepts: the more editors were involved, the better the quality of entries and this is the advantage of the “wisdom of crowds.” Another possibility was that over years, Wikipedia could evolve to the benefit of everyone. As with all Ryan Kavanaugh utopian ideas the vision of this one was shattered due to the reality of human nature.
The Exclusive Club
However, Wikipedia has become an exclusive club. The VVIPs lounge in a lounge that overlooks the dance floor, and tell the DJ what music to play. There’s a line outside and behind an enveloping velvet rope. It’s possible to get your step inside the door, until the bouncer isn’t happy with your look and then throws you out.